Free Praxis 5331 practice test

A free Praxis SLP practice test you can take right here

10 original questions in the Praxis 5331 format, one from every Big Nine area. Answer one, then open the rationale to see why the key is right and why each of the other three is wrong. Nothing is behind a signup, an email box, or a card.

Questions
10
Big Nine areas
9
Content categories
3
Signup required
No

What the Praxis 5331 actually is

These are the numbers ETS publishes. Every commercial prep site restates them, and several round the testing time to two and a half hours, which is close enough to plan by and far enough off to matter when you are pacing a real form.

Questions
132

Selected-response items on a full form. No essays, no oral section.

Testing time
150 min

One block. Commercial prep sites round this to 2.5 hours.

Per question
68 sec

150 minutes divided by 132 questions, on average.

Categories
3

44 questions each, one third of the exam apiece.

The three content categories

  1. Foundations and Professional Practice

    44 questions33 1/3%

    Typical development, anatomy and physiology, the nature of each disorder, research design, ethics, and the laws that govern practice. Mostly recall and recognition.

  2. Screening, Assessment, Evaluation, and Diagnosis

    44 questions33 1/3%

    Choosing a screening or assessment tool, reading the scores it produces, ruling a diagnosis in or out, and knowing when a referral belongs to someone else.

  3. Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation of Treatment

    44 questions33 1/3%

    Selecting a target, picking an approach, sequencing it, measuring whether it worked, and deciding what to change when it did not.

A question bank is not a timed form

Almost all free Praxis practice online, including the 10 questions below, is bank practice. You answer one question, read the rationale, and move on when you are ready. That is the right way to learn content, and it is not what test day feels like.

A form gives you 132 questions and 150 minutes in one block. That averages about 68 seconds a question, including the ones where you read the stem twice and the ones where you are choosing between two options that both look defensible. You cannot look anything up. You cannot stop after a hard item to settle down. Most students find the content easier than the clock the first time they sit a full form, and the fix is not more content: it is having sat one before.

So use the questions below to find out what you know. Then sit at least one full timed form before test day, whoever you sit it with. SLP Study Hub builds one at 132 questions in 150 minutes with the same three-category split as a real form, and reports your result by Big Nine area rather than as a single number.

The 10 questions

One from each of the nine Big Nine areas, plus one more from receptive and expressive language, which carries more of a form than any other area. They run easiest first. Give yourself about 68 seconds each if you want the pacing to be realistic.

  1. Cat. IIIReceptive & Expressive LanguageQuestion 1 of 10Recall

    Which of the following BEST describes the "S" component of a SMART goal?

    1. AThe goal should be supported by standardized assessment data
    2. BThe goal should identify a precise, observable behavior the client will perform
    3. CThe goal should be structured as a sequential hierarchy of objectives
    4. DThe goal should be sensitive to cultural and linguistic background
    Show the answer and why

    B. The goal should identify a precise, observable behavior the client will perform

    In the SMART framework, "S" stands for Specific. A specific goal clearly identifies what behavior the client will demonstrate, under what conditions, and with what level of support. It avoids vague language like "improve" or "get better" in favor of precise, observable actions.

    Why the others are wrong

    • AAssessment data informs goal writing, but the "S" in SMART stands for Specific, not supported by standardized data.
    • CA sequential hierarchy of objectives describes how goals are ordered over time, not what the "S" in SMART means.
    • DCultural and linguistic responsiveness belongs in treatment planning, and it does not define the "S" in SMART goals.
  2. Cat. IISocial Communication / PragmaticsQuestion 2 of 10Recall

    Which assessment tool is specifically designed to evaluate pragmatic language abilities in school-age children?

    1. ATest of Problem Solving (TOPS-3)
    2. BComprehensive Assessment of Spoken Language (CASL-2)
    3. CExpressive Vocabulary Test (EVT-3)
    4. DSocial Language Development Test (SLDT)
    Show the answer and why

    D. Social Language Development Test (SLDT)

    The Social Language Development Test (SLDT) specifically evaluates social/pragmatic language skills including making inferences, interpreting social situations, and understanding nonliteral language in school-age children.

    Why the others are wrong

    • ATOPS-3 assesses critical thinking and problem-solving language, not specifically pragmatic/social communication.
    • BCASL-2 is a comprehensive language battery that includes a pragmatic judgment subtest but is not specifically designed as a pragmatic language measure.
    • CEVT-3 measures expressive vocabulary through word retrieval, not pragmatic language.
  3. Cat. IIIFeeding & SwallowingQuestion 3 of 10Recall

    The Mendelsohn maneuver is designed primarily to:

    1. AStrengthen the tongue base against the posterior pharyngeal wall
    2. BProlong and elevate hyolaryngeal excursion to improve UES opening
    3. CIncrease vocal fold adduction before the pharyngeal swallow begins
    4. DImprove bolus formation and cohesion within the oral cavity
    Show the answer and why

    B. Prolong and elevate hyolaryngeal excursion to improve UES opening

    The Mendelsohn maneuver involves voluntarily prolonging laryngeal elevation at the peak of the swallow. This extended hyolaryngeal excursion increases the duration and extent of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) opening, facilitating bolus clearance through the pharyngoesophageal segment.

    Why the others are wrong

    • ATongue base retraction exercises (e.g., Masako maneuver) target tongue base-to-pharyngeal wall contact, not the Mendelsohn.
    • CClosing the vocal folds before the pharyngeal swallow begins is the mechanism of the supraglottic and super-supraglottic maneuvers.
    • DOral bolus formation and cohesion improve with lingual strengthening and bolus-control practice, not with the Mendelsohn maneuver.
  4. Cat. IIISpeech Sound ProductionQuestion 4 of 10Application

    An SLP is writing a treatment goal for a 4-year-old child with a phonological disorder who deletes all final consonants. Which of the following is the BEST example of a measurable, functional SMART goal?

    1. AGiven conversational play, the child will improve final consonant production across a range of familiar words
    2. BGiven minimal pair activities, the child will produce final consonants in CVC words with 80% accuracy across 3 consecutive sessions
    3. CGiven syllable drill, the child will produce /t, d, n/ in word-final position within a six-month reporting period
    4. DGiven a picture field of four, the child will identify words that end in a final consonant with 80% accuracy across three sessions of therapy
    Show the answer and why

    B. Given minimal pair activities, the child will produce final consonants in CVC words with 80% accuracy across 3 consecutive sessions

    This goal meets all SMART criteria: Specific (final consonants in CVC words), Measurable (80% accuracy), Achievable (appropriate for age and pattern), Relevant (functional for intelligibility), and Time-bound (implied by the criterion of 3 consecutive sessions). It also specifies the condition (minimal pair activities).

    Why the others are wrong

    • AThis goal names a condition but no criterion. "Improve" cannot be measured, and no accuracy level or time frame is given.
    • CThis goal names the sounds, the word position, and a time frame, but it sets no accuracy criterion, so progress against it cannot be scored.
    • DThis goal is measurable, but it targets receptive identification. The deficit is expressive, so the target should be production of final consonants in words the child says.
  5. Cat. IIFluencyQuestion 5 of 10Application

    An SLP is assessing a 7-year-old child for stuttering. The child exhibits part-word repetitions, prolongations, and visible tension in the jaw during speech. In addition to frequency measures, which of the following should the SLP evaluate?

    1. AThe child's awareness, emotional reactions, avoidance behaviors, and impact on communication participation
    2. BThe number of disfluencies per 100 syllables, converted to a severity rating using the published tables
    3. CStandardized articulation testing to rule out a co-occurring speech sound disorder before fluency treatment starts
    4. DParent report of the child's reactions, since a 7-year-old cannot describe feelings about speech reliably
    Show the answer and why

    A. The child's awareness, emotional reactions, avoidance behaviors, and impact on communication participation

    A comprehensive stuttering evaluation goes beyond frequency counts to include assessment of secondary behaviors (tension, struggle), the child's cognitive and affective reactions, avoidance behaviors, and impact on communication participation. The ASHA practice guidelines emphasize a multidimensional assessment approach.

    Why the others are wrong

    • BFrequency and its severity conversion capture the surface behavior only. Severity as the child experiences it also involves tension, avoidance, and communicative impact.
    • CCo-occurring speech sound disorders are worth checking, but the question asks what else belongs in the fluency evaluation, and the child's own experience of stuttering is that answer.
    • DParent report is valuable, but children as young as 3 show awareness of stuttering. A 7-year-old can report attitudes, feelings, and avoidance directly.
  6. Cat. IIAACQuestion 6 of 10Application

    An SLP is selecting an AAC system for a 10-year-old with cerebral palsy who has severe dysarthria, good receptive language, and limited hand function. Which assessment approach is MOST critical before recommending a specific AAC device?

    1. ADetermine the child's reading level so the system can be built around text rather than symbol vocabulary
    2. BConduct a motor access evaluation to determine the most reliable and efficient method of device access
    3. CAdminister a standardized language assessment to establish a language age and match the vocabulary set to it
    4. DInterview the classroom teacher about academic vocabulary needs and the communication demands of each class period
    Show the answer and why

    B. Conduct a motor access evaluation to determine the most reliable and efficient method of device access

    For children with severe motor impairments, determining the most reliable and efficient access method (direct selection, scanning, eye gaze, head tracking, switch access) is the most critical step. Without identifying a viable motor access pathway, no AAC system can be used effectively.

    Why the others are wrong

    • AReading level shapes whether vocabulary is represented with symbols or text, but that choice is secondary to establishing how the child will physically reach any selection at all.
    • CA language age helps with vocabulary selection and organization, and should not become a prerequisite for access. It still does not answer how the child will operate the device.
    • DTeacher input identifies functional communication needs across the school day, but it does not address the motor access barrier that determines whether any system is usable.
  7. Cat. IIIHearingQuestion 7 of 10Application

    An SLP is planning treatment for a 9-year-old student with a mild-moderate hearing loss who wears bilateral hearing aids. The student struggles with following multi-step directions in the noisy classroom. Which treatment approach is MOST appropriate?

    1. AIntensive articulation therapy focused on speech sound accuracy in connected speech
    2. BTotal communication approach using sign language as the primary classroom modality with an interpreter present
    3. CAuditory training combined with self-advocacy skill instruction and classroom accommodation strategies
    4. DWritten language therapy focusing on reading comprehension and classroom note-taking skills
    Show the answer and why

    C. Auditory training combined with self-advocacy skill instruction and classroom accommodation strategies

    For a student with hearing loss wearing hearing aids who struggles in noise, treatment should include auditory training to improve listening in degraded conditions, self-advocacy skills (requesting repetition, preferential seating, FM system use), and collaboration with the teacher on classroom accommodations. This multicomponent approach addresses both the auditory deficit and the environmental barriers.

    Why the others are wrong

    • AThe concern is following directions in noise, not sound production. Articulation work in connected speech does not improve listening through a degraded signal.
    • BThe student is an oral communicator with bilateral aids and mild-moderate loss. Shifting to sign with an interpreter is not warranted by this profile.
    • DReading comprehension and note-taking are written language targets. Neither addresses difficulty following spoken multi-step directions in noise.
  8. Cat. IVoice, Resonance & Motor SpeechQuestion 8 of 10Analysis

    An SLP is reviewing an ethical dilemma: A patient with Parkinson's disease has been making steady progress in voice therapy (LSVT LOUD). The patient's insurance has approved only 16 sessions, which have now been completed. The patient wants to continue but cannot afford to self-pay. The SLP should:

    1. AContinue providing weekly therapy sessions free of charge until the patient's gains plateau
    2. BDischarge the patient immediately, since the approved sessions have already been exhausted
    3. CReduce contact to pro bono monthly check-ins without providing a written home practice program
    4. DBuild a home program with caregiver training and appeal the denial with documentation
    Show the answer and why

    D. Build a home program with caregiver training and appeal the denial with documentation

    When insurance coverage ends but clinical need remains, the SLP should take a multi-faceted approach: develop a robust home program to maintain gains, train caregivers to support practice, appeal the insurance decision with clinical documentation, and explore alternative funding (sliding scale, community resources, grants). This balances patient welfare with practical constraints. ASHA ethics require that clinicians advocate for needed services while working within realistic boundaries.

    Why the others are wrong

    • AOpen-ended free care is not sustainable for the clinician or the practice. A structured plan that builds independence protects the gains without that cost.
    • BDischarging on the day authorization runs out, with no home program and no appeal, risks losing the gains from sixteen sessions of intensive work.
    • CMonthly check-ins can be one part of a plan. Alone, without a home program, caregiver training, or an appeal, they leave the daily practice that LSVT depends on unsupported.
  9. Cat. IIReceptive & Expressive LanguageQuestion 9 of 10Analysis

    A 68-year-old patient post-left CVA presents with the following profile: nonfluent, effortful speech with short phrase length; agrammatic output; relatively preserved auditory comprehension for simple commands but difficulty with syntactically complex sentences; impaired repetition; and intact automatic speech (e.g., counting, reciting days of the week). This profile is most consistent with:

    1. ABroca aphasia
    2. BWernicke aphasia
    3. CGlobal aphasia
    4. DTranscortical sensory aphasia
    Show the answer and why

    A. Broca aphasia

    The profile of nonfluent, agrammatic output with relatively preserved comprehension (especially for simple material), impaired repetition, and preserved automatic speech is the hallmark presentation of Broca aphasia. The difficulty with syntactically complex comprehension is also consistent, as Broca aphasia involves syntactic processing deficits across modalities.

    Why the others are wrong

    • BWernicke aphasia features fluent output with poor comprehension, which is the opposite of this presentation.
    • CGlobal aphasia involves severely impaired output AND comprehension, with very limited communication across all modalities. This patient has relatively preserved comprehension.
    • DTranscortical sensory aphasia features fluent output with poor comprehension but INTACT repetition, which differs from this patient.
  10. Cat. ICognitive CommunicationQuestion 10 of 10Analysis

    A patient sustained a stroke affecting the right hemisphere. The SLP would expect this patient to demonstrate which of the following communication profiles?

    1. AImpaired prosody, pragmatics, and discourse with preserved linguistic structure
    2. BNonfluent aphasia with agrammatism, effortful halting output, and preserved comprehension
    3. CSevere anomia with preserved fluency, repetition, and auditory comprehension skills
    4. DPure word deafness with preserved reading and writing but impaired auditory comprehension
    Show the answer and why

    A. Impaired prosody, pragmatics, and discourse with preserved linguistic structure

    Right hemisphere damage produces a characteristic communication profile that includes impaired affective prosody (monotone speech, difficulty interpreting emotional tone), pragmatic deficits (difficulty interpreting humor, sarcasm, implied meaning), and disorganized discourse (tangential, verbose). Linguistic structure (phonology, morphology, syntax) is typically preserved because these functions are lateralized to the left hemisphere in most individuals.

    Why the others are wrong

    • BNonfluent, agrammatic output follows damage to the left inferior frontal region. Right hemisphere stroke leaves grammar and fluency largely intact.
    • CAnomia with preserved fluency, repetition, and comprehension is anomic aphasia, a left hemisphere syndrome. Word retrieval is not the primary problem after right hemisphere damage.
    • DPure word deafness follows bilateral or left temporal auditory cortex lesions and spares reading. It is not part of the right hemisphere profile.

What to do with the ones you missed

Ten questions is enough to notice a pattern and not enough to trust one. If two of the three you missed were assessment questions, that is a hint, not a finding. The free diagnostic is 12 questions, about 6 minutes and ranks all nine areas from strongest to weakest, which is a real starting point.

Common questions

How many questions are on the Praxis 5331?
132 selected-response questions in 150 minutes, which works out to about 68 seconds a question. They are split across three content categories of 44 questions each, and each category is worth one third of the exam.
Is this practice test really free?
Yes. All 10 questions and all 10 rationales are on this page. There is no account to create, no email to hand over, and no card.
How is a timed form different from a question bank?
A bank lets you stop, look something up, and answer the next one when you are ready. A form gives you one block of time for every question at once, so pacing and stamina are being tested alongside content. Most students find the content easier than the clock the first time they sit a full form, which is why it is worth doing at least one before test day.
What score do I need to pass?
ASHA requires a 162 on the 100 to 200 scale for the Certificate of Clinical Competence. State licensure boards set their own cut scores, so check the board for the state you plan to work in as well.
Are these real Praxis questions?
No. Every question here is original, written for SLP Study Hub against the publicly available ETS test blueprint. Reproducing an ETS question would be a copyright problem and would not help you anyway, since the form you sit will be different.

Disclaimer: Praxis is a registered trademark of Educational Testing Service (ETS). SLP Study Hub is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by ETS or ASHA. Every question on this page is original content written for SLP Study Hub and aligned to the publicly available Praxis 5331 test blueprint. No ETS question is reproduced here.